Centralized Partnership Audit Regime

New Partnership Audit Rules

New audit rules (centralized partnership audit regime) are now in place for all domestic and foreign partnerships for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. Partnerships and tax advisors should be aware of these changes and understand the implications.

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act – Centralized Partnership Audit Regime

Effective January 1, 2018, the new “centralized partnership audit regime” replaces the current audit procedures enacted under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”).

Old Audit Rules

Under the old rules, audit adjustments are passed through and collected at the partner level.

New Audit Rules

The new partnership rules now permit the IRS to examine and assess audit liabilities at the entity level. This single-tiered approach requires diligent planning when structuring ownership interests, modifying existing governing documents and deciding on proper tax elections.

Opting-Out of New Rules

An election to opt-out of the rules of this new regime is available to eligible partnerships.

Generally, a partnership if eligible if:

  1. It has 100 or fewer partners.
  2. All are considered eligible partners.

Eligible partners are any of the following:

  • individuals
  • C corporations
  • S corporations
  • eligible foreign entities
  • estates of deceased partners

The election must be made annually on a timely filed tax return. Without the proper election, the new rules will automatically apply and any underpayments will be calculated at the highest federal income tax rate, currently 37%.

Generally, assessments will not be adjusted for in the year of audit (“reviewed year”). Partnerships under examination will have the option to make a “Push-Out Election”. This allows the entity to pass any assessed liability to the partners in the reviewed year subject to audit rather than to the partners in the concluded adjustment year. This election reduces the exposure for any partners who may not have held interest in the review year.

New procedures under the regime should be reviewed and addressed as soon as possible to comply with the new regulations and strategically manage audit risk at both the partnership and partner levels.

Author

Engineered Tax Services

Engineered Tax Services

Recent Posts

section 174

What Does Section 174’s New Amortization Rule Mean for R&D Credits?

Future changes to the way companies can take deductions from research and development expenses may make investing in innovation more difficult, particularly for small businesses and startups. Furthermore, these new regulations may have a negative impact on U.S. national security. Business owners should have long-term strategy in mind when determining how to properly classify expenses.

Read More »

Establishing Your Accounting Firm On Social Media

Establishing your accounting firm’s voice on social media should be a top priority. If your firm doesn’t have a brand guide that includes its tone of voice, now is the perfect time to create one. It doesn’t have to be a full-blown brand guide⁠—just something that helps to establish and maintain a consistent brand voice.

Read More »
employee retention tax credit scams

How to avoid employee retention tax credit scams

A survey by the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) found that only 4% of small business owners are “very familiar” with the Employee Retention Tax Credit program. Furthermore, only 32% said they were “somewhat familiar” with the incentive. Scammers are taking advantage of this unfamiliarity to collect high fees from business owners. Unscrupulous companies

Read More »

Contact Us