The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation – What They Mean and What They Really Mean

This is Part 2 of a two-part article series that will appearing in the September 2010 issue of “Licensed Architect,” published in print and online by the Association of Licensed Architects. Access Part 1 online here. The following article is for informational purposes only and should not be constructed as legal or business advice – architects should seek their own counsel when undertaking any of the serves discussed in this article.


Central to any project's approval for Historic Rehab Incentives is its compliance with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation (the “Standards”), which are published by the National Park Service (NPS) as a set of guiding concepts to ensure that properties retain their essential historic character during rehabilitation. While complying with the Standards can mean qualifying for incentives, failing to comply almost always means denial. In addition to denied Historic Rehab Incentives, locally landmarked projects that fail to meet the Standards may also fail to obtain permit approval from local historic preservation commissions.

But despite the importance of a historic rehab project's compliance with the Standards, and, despite some of the Standard's interpretations having become a little calcified over the decades, they most definitely aren't carved in stone. The Standards are not prescriptive specifications; they're performance guidelines that require interpretation on a case-by-case basis.

Click here for entire article (Part II)Gary L. Cole AIA, ALA, Esq. is Chicago-based Illinois and Florida-licensed architect and attorney and an expert in historic rehabilitation, preservation law and development financial incentives. He was a Historical Architect for the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, a Visiting Associate Professor of Architecture at the University of Illinois Graduate School of Architecture and, as an attorney, has represented clients in preservation-related matters in Chicago, South Florida and Washington, D.C. He has worked for two of Chicago's largest law firms and was in-house counsel for one of the Southeast's largest retail developers. He practices construction, real estate, preservation and accessibility law and is a Certified Mediator and a member of the Roster of Neutrals for the American Arbitration Association. He publishes timely articles on a wide range of subjects at www.lawarkbuilding.com.

Recent Posts

CPA cost segregation

The Tax Break Your CPA Might Not Tell You About

Commercial property owners, there’s a powerful tax strategy you might be missing out on: a cost segregation study. A properly done study can unlock huge tax savings by letting you depreciate certain building components more quickly. Surprisingly, many property owners haven’t explored this option. You may be asking yourself, “If this tax strategy is so

Read More »
fixed fee R&D tax credits

Fixed Fee vs. Time and Materials: Tax Credit Implications

Research and development (R&D) tax credits are a powerful financial incentive for companies willing to push the boundaries of innovation. These credits reward businesses that invest in developing new products, processes or technologies—essentially encouraging them to take risks that benefit society as a whole. However, not all R&D projects qualify for tax credits. To make

Read More »

What to Do With Unused Tax Deductions

Tax deductions are valuable tools that reduce the amount of your income that’s subject to taxation. They can save you money—but sometimes, you might not be able to fully utilize all your deductions within a single tax year. This article will explain what happens to those unused deductions and provide strategies to help you make

Read More »

Contact Us